Random Ads
Content
Content
Content

Senate probes Akpoti-Uduaghan’s conduct with vote for Akpabio

3 hours ago 21

From Adesuwa Tsan, Abuja

The Senate on Tuesday directed its Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Public Petitions to probe the conduct of the senator representing Kogi Central, Sen. Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, on the floor of the Senate last Thursday.

It also passed a vote of confidence in Senate President Godswill Akpabio, saying he was only protecting the institution of the Senate of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

This was sequel to the consideration and debate on a report by the Spokesman of the Senate, Chairman of the Senate Committee on Media and Public Affairs, Sen. Yemi Adaramodu (Ekiti South), on news publications and reports on the incident.

Akpoti-Uduaghan sparked controversy when she accused the Senate President, Sen. Godswill Akpabio, among other things, of reallocating her seat in the Senate Chambers in order to “silence” and intimidate her while reacting to the change of her seat.

She had raised her voice in plenary to challenge the Senate President and refused all entreaties by her colleagues to explain the rationale behind the decision.

Relying on Order 1(b), Adaramodu cited an interview which she had with the host of Brekete Family on Human Rights Radio and TV, Ordinary Ahmad Isah, wherein she further levelled allegations against the Senate President.

He decried the distorted reportage of what transpired and urged the Senate to act on it.

Responding to the report, Leader of the Senate, Sen. Opeyemi Bamidele (Ekiti Central), reminded his colleagues that there is a standing committee which addresses issues such as the one raised by the House Spokesman. He, therefore, urged them to refer the matter to the Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Public Petitions for further legislative action.

His position was carried by the Senate President, who emphasised the importance of adhering to Senate rules. He noted that he had observed that Sen. Akpoti-Uduaghan has not studied her rule book, so she is unfamiliar with parliamentary procedures.

“I was a member of the 8th Senate; today I’m a member of the 10th Senate. I believe strongly that it’s only God that knows who will be a member of the 11th Senate, 12th Senate, but the institution remains. As I’m talking now, Senator Fatai Buhari knows that the rule does not allow a senator to sit anywhere, but if you need to make a contribution, you must go back to your seat, and this is part of the maintenance of order by the presiding officer.

“The first time the issue came up, our distinguished sister was not even speaking from her seat, and that was when we tried to call her to order. I think part of the problem is when people come from court—court-declared senators—they miss the orientation.”

Akpabio subsequently ordered the management of the National Assembly to henceforth organise periodic orientation for senators who did not start from the beginning of the assembly.

“Because I remember that this particular senator (Akpoti-Uduaghan), on the day she was sworn in, raised her hand to speak. I was scared, but I had to recognise her because I was saying, we just gave her the rule book as part of what we give to you when you are sworn in.

“So I said, has she even opened the rule book to know what to say before? She made a complete deviation. I think two days later, she got a motion. There is nothing wrong with being vibrant, but there is a lot wrong when you don’t know anything about the procedure.”

Akpabio cited various sections of the Senate Standing Orders to justify his stance, stressing that he has been empowered to suspend erring senators for 14 days in the first instance, without any committee investigating the matter, to ensure that decorum is maintained at all times.

Justifying his directive for the sergeant-at-arms to walk her out when she refused to calm down, he read section 66(1) from the Senate Rule Book: “In the case of sitting as chairman of the Committee of the Whole, [he] shall order such a senator whose conduct is grossly disorderly to withdraw immediately from the Senate for the remainder of that day’s sitting. The President of the Senate shall order such a senator to withdraw in the event that he views her conduct or his conduct to be disorderly for the remainder of that day’s sitting. And the sergeant-at-arms shall act on such orders or he may receive from the chair impetus of this order.”

“Look at 55, behaviour of senators in the Senate. This one is a general thing we must read when given to us. It’s like a Bible in a church and like a Quran in a mosque. At the entry, or let’s say, during a sitting, that is section 55(2), all senators shall enter or leave the Senate with decorum. It means that the sanctity of the Senate must be maintained, and please go through it; you see what is expected of a senator. You can’t even cross the floor during sittings. You can’t chew chewing gum during sittings. You cannot even drink water in the chamber during sitting. We cannot pass between chairs; at the point of putting a question during sitting, no senator can step out of the chamber or pass between chairs.

“Then if you go to section 6, the President of the Senate shall allocate a seat to each senator. A senator may only speak from the seat allocated to him, provided that the president of the Senate may change that allocation from time to time.”

“Here, this book here gives the power to the Senate President to even suspend a senator for at least 14 legislative days without reference to any committee. And that means if we are sitting three times in a week, that comes to about five weeks, without reference to any committee.”

Read Entire Article