1 week ago
25
By Abubakar Momodu
For years, Kaduna has been a flashpoint for banditry, with communities like Chikun, Kagarko, Giwa, Kajuru, and BirninGwari bearing the brunt of these attacks. Residents have faced rampant kidnappings, loss of lives, destruction of farmlands, and decimation of properties. Major highways in the state have also become unsafe, disrupting economic activities and isolating communities from essential services.
Despite various security measures deployed in the past, the violence persisted, leaving many residents disillusioned and desperate for a solution. It is in this context of despair and public outcry that Governor Sani’s administration decided to chart a new course by engaging the bandits in dialogue.
Kaduna State Governor, Senator Uba Sani, has taken a controversial but decisive step to initiate dialogue with bandits terrorizing communities in the state. This move has sparked widespread debate, especially given the hardline stance of his predecessor, Nasir El-Rufa’i, who adamantly opposed negotiating with such groups. However, Sani’s rationale for opting for peace talks is rooted in the dire need to restore normalcy to a region that has suffered untold hardship for over a decade.
It should be stressed that Governor Sani’s decision to negotiate with bandits stems from a deep sense of responsibility to the people of Kaduna. In his interview with the BBC Hausa Service, the governor emphasized that the calls for dialogue were initiated by those most affected by the violence, including traditional and community leaders like the Emir of BirninGwari.
The Emir and his people pleaded for an end to the violence, highlighting the devastation their communities had endured for years. Their plea underscores the fact that for many in these areas, the priority is survival and peace, even if it means negotiating with those who caused their suffering.
Displaying humane approach to governance, Governor Sani stated that, “I’d rather negotiate with bandits than to bear the weight of a single life lost in Kaduna,”. This reflects his commitment to the sanctity of human life. His willingness to explore dialogue, despite its controversial nature, signals a pragmatic and empathetic approach to governance. For him, the ultimate accountability lies not just with voters but also with his conscience and faith.
The release of 200 abducted persons from Giwa and BirninGwari by the bandits served as a significant breakthrough in the peace process. This act of goodwill not only demonstrated the potential for progress but also restored a glimmer of hope to communities long resigned to despair.
One of the primary concerns surrounding negotiations with bandits is the possibility of ransom payments, which could inadvertently fund further criminal activities. However, Governor Sani was unequivocal in his assurance that no money was exchanged during the peace talks.
The negotiations, he explained, were conducted with the support and collaboration of traditional and religious leaders, whose influence and credibility played a pivotal role in fostering trust between the government and the bandits. The process, which spanned six months, was meticulously handled to ensure transparency and sustainability.
Governor Sani’s decision to engage in dialogue marks a stark departure from the policies of his predecessor, Nasir El-Rufa’i. During his tenure, El-Rufa’i maintained a zero-tolerance approach to negotiating with bandits, stating that it was not the government’s role to ask them to repent.
While El-Rufa’i’s hardline stance was popular among those who believed in a military-first approach, it failed to bring about the lasting peace that many communities desperately sought. Sani’s willingness to explore alternative solutions reflects a recognition that conventional methods alone may not suffice in addressing the complexities of banditry in Kaduna.
The success of the peace initiative owes much to the active involvement of stakeholders, including the National Security Adviser, traditional rulers, religious leaders, and community members. Their collective efforts have helped bridge the gap between the government and the bandits, fostering an environment conducive to dialogue.
This collaborative approach also ensures that the peace process is inclusive and reflective of the needs and aspirations of the affected communities. By involving these stakeholders, Governor Sani has laid the groundwork for a more sustainable and locally driven solution to the lingering crisis of banditry and violent extremism.
Following the proactive measure by Governor Sani, for the first time in years, residents of Kaduna are beginning to experience a sense of normalcy. The reduction in attacks and the restoration of economic activities which signal a potential turning point for the state. Governor Sani’s bold and unconventional approach has provided a glimmer of hope to communities long plagued by insecurity.
The governor is also not relenting on the peace initiative, he has put measures in place for a broader strategy to address the root causes of banditry. This includes tackling poverty, improving access to education and healthcare, and providing opportunities for economic empowerment.
Under Sani’s watch, the security agencies are prepared to respond decisively should any group attempt to undermine the peace process. The involvement of stakeholders and the emphasis on community-driven solutions is pivotal on this score in ensuring the sustainability of the initiative.
Governor Uba Sani’s decision to negotiate with bandits represents a bold and compassionate effort to restore peace to Kaduna State. While the approach is not without controversy, it reflects a pragmatic understanding of the complex realities on the ground.
By prioritizing dialogue over violence, Governor Sani has demonstrated a deep commitment to the welfare of his people and a willingness to take risks for the greater good. As Kaduna begins to heal, the lessons learned from this initiative could serve as a blueprint for addressing similar challenges in other parts of Nigeria.
Ultimately, the success of the peace process will depend on the collective efforts of the government, stakeholders, and communities. With continued prayers, vigilance, and collaboration, Kaduna can emerge stronger and more united, serving as a beacon of hope for other regions grappling with insecurity.
• Momodu writes from Kaduna State
English (US) ·