Speaking in an exclusive interview with Rudolf Okonkwo on
90MinutesAfrica, Amadi described Obi’s political style as “minimalist”, saying
it frustrates efforts by the ruling party to suppress or weaken his movement.

According to Amadi, Obi’s unconventional approach gives him
flexibility and resilience in a system dominated by structure-based politics,
but it also limits his ability to build enduring political institutions.

“Look at how he runs his campaign. It is difficult for the
APC government to stop him because he is everywhere. He has no structure for
them to smash. But he also has his own downside,” Amadi said.

He noted that Obi, who contested the 2023 presidential
election under the Labour Party (LP), relies more on organic popular
mobilisation and less on party machinery.

Amadi said this method makes him an elusive political figure
but one with institutional weaknesses.

“Peter Obi is not the type of politician who can carry the
burden of organising institutions and structures, which require enormous time
and resources,” he added.

Amadi said Obi’s preference for lean organisation reflects
his minimalist strategy — maximising visibility and public connection while
minimising bureaucratic overheads. This, he explained, makes it difficult for
entrenched political actors to contain or co-opt his movement.

Beyond electoral politics, Amadi also spoke on religious
tensions in northern Nigeria, warning that Christians in the region are
increasingly treated as second-class citizens.

He described the violence against them as “state-tolerated
and sanctioned mass violence”.

He traced the roots of the crisis to the year 2000 when
twelve northern states adopted the 
Sharia law, effectively creating “two republics” within Nigeria — a
secular federal republic and an Islamic one.

“In the year 2000, the twelve northern states became Islamic
republics by virtue of enacting criminal Sharia into their laws. So Nigeria
became two republics in one – the Federal Republic, which is secular, and the
Islamic Republic,” Amadi said.

“That is why they can kill someone for blasphemy without any
consequences. The Nigerian Constitution guarantees the right of every Nigerian
to change their religion, but under Sharia, one cannot change religion.

“So, the Nigerian state is toying with inconsistency and
contradictions. I see the northern Christians becoming more of second-class
citizens. So yes, the Nigerian state is guilty and complicit in the sustained
violence against northern Christians.”