Human Rights Under Tinubu Has Been A Mixed Bag – Ojo 

 Barrister Olalekan F. Ojo, a Lagos-based human rights lawyer and strong advocate of social justice, is the Managing Partner, Platinum & Taylor Hill LP, a leading law firm in Nigeria. In this interview with EJIKEME OMENAZU, he speaks on the human rights records of the current administration, among other crucial issues in the polity. Excerpt: 

 Barrister, could you briefly tell us about yourself? 

I have extensive experience in corporate law, dispute resolution, fintech, and human rights advocacy. Beyond my legal practice, I am passionate about leveraging innovation to enhance the legal profession, particularly in arbitration, AI-powered legal automation, and compliance consulting. 

We understand that you have a soft spot for activism and human rights. What is your experience in this regard? 

Yes, I have always been passionate about human rights and social justice. Throughout my career, I have worked on several pro-bono cases, particularly in the areas of fundamental rights enforcement, police brutality, and unlawful detentions. I have also collaborated with human rights organisations to push for legal reforms that protect vulnerable individuals. For me, the law is not just about contracts and corporate affairs. It is also a tool for justice, fairness, and the defense of fundamental freedoms. 

How do you see the human rights records of the current administration? 

The human rights landscape under this administration has been a mixed bag. While there have been some commendable efforts in legislative reforms, issues such as press freedom, police brutality, and the suppression of dissent remain areas of concern. The right to peaceful protest, for instance, is a cornerstone of democracy, yet we have seen cases where lawful demonstrations have been met with force. There is still a long way to go in ensuring full respect for human rights in Nigeria. 

What is your view on the way the current administration sees activists and activism? 

Activism plays a crucial role in a democratic society, serving as a check on government excesses and amplifying the voices of the marginalised. However, the current administration appears to view activism with suspicion, often equating it with subversion or opposition politics. This approach is counterproductive because activism, when conducted within legal boundaries, strengthens democracy rather than weakens it. Governments thrive when they engage with activists constructively rather than silencing them. 

Would you say the Leftists have a better alternative for the leadership of the country? If so, do you think they have sufficient followership and strength to achieve this? 

The Leftist movement in Nigeria presents an alternative ideological approach to governance, focusing on social justice, wealth redistribution, and workers’ rights. However, their ability to successfully challenge the status quo depends on two factors: unity and strategic mobilisation. While there is growing dissatisfaction with mainstream political leadership, the Leftists must build a stronger grassroots structure and communicate clear, pragmatic solutions that resonate with the electorate. Without these, their impact will remain limited. 

Do you think that all Leftist organisations and political parties should come together under one umbrella to overcome the nation’s ruling class for proper democratic leadership? If so, who among the Leftists could lead such a move? 

Unity is always a powerful force in politics. If Leftist organisations and political parties can align under a common vision, they stand a better chance of effecting change. However, for such a coalition to be successful, they must move beyond ideological rhetoric and present a well-structured governance blueprint. In terms of leadership, individuals with both credibility and political strategy – those who can appeal to a broad spectrum of the populace – should spearhead the movement. Some names have demonstrated a commitment to progressive governance and may be well-positioned to lead such an alliance. 

How do you see the various reforms of the current administration? Would you say they are really having a positive impact on the country? 

Reforms should be measured by their real-life impact on citizens. While some economic and policy changes by the administration have been well-intended, the implementation has often lacked inclusivity and clear direction. For example, subsidy removal and foreign exchange liberalisation have created short-term hardships that could have been mitigated with better planning. The challenge is not just about policy changes, but about ensuring they translate into tangible benefits for the average Nigerian. 

Would you say the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) and the Trade Union Congress (TUC) are really championing the cause of the common man, especially the workers? What do you think are their challenges? 

The Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) and the Trade Union Congress (TUC) have historically played a significant role in defending workers’ rights. However, their effectiveness has been inconsistent in recent years. One major challenge they face is the need for greater unity and strategic engagement with the government. Beyond protests and strikes, they must adopt stronger negotiation tactics and leverage economic policies to push for long-term worker-friendly reforms. 

The TUC National President recently said that there is a need for the government and the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) to exercise proper control over the value of the dollar against the naira to check inflation and incessant tariff hikes on essential services. What are your thoughts on this? 

Currency stability is crucial for economic growth. While market-driven exchange rates have their benefits, unchecked fluctuations can lead to inflation and economic hardship. The government and CBN must adopt a balanced approach – implementing policies that boost local production, encourage foreign investment, and curb speculative activities in the forex market. Simply controlling the value of the Naira without addressing the underlying economic issues will not be sustainable. 

Former Lagos Speaker Mudashiru Obasa has said that his removal was wrong. Do you think he has a case? Or, is he fighting a lost battle? 

Legally speaking, the circumstances surrounding his removal must be examined based on the procedural correctness of the process. If due process was not followed, he may have a legitimate case. However, if his removal was in line with established legislative protocols, then his options may be limited. Ultimately, the courts will be the best arbiters in determining the legality of his claims. 

What is the current state of the case against the Lagos State government over a large expanse of land at Abule Egba, which you are handling on behalf of the owners? 

The case against the Lagos State government over the large expanse of land at Plots 412/420, Lagos-Abeokuta Expressway, Abule-Egba, remains a troubling example of the disregard for the rule of law and property rights in Nigeria. Despite a binding Consent Judgment delivered by Honourable Justice O.A. Ogala in December 2019, which recognised the E.J. Alex Kehinde Taylor Family as the rightful owners of the property, the Lagos State government has failed to comply with the judgment. Instead, it has resorted to arbitrary revocation, prolonged litigation, and bureaucratic maneuvers to delay justice. This case is not just about land ownership; it is about the sanctity of private property rights, adherence to court rulings, and the credibility of governance. The continued occupation of the land by the Lagos State government without adequate compensation is not only illegal, but also a grave injustice to the Taylor Family, who have owned and managed this property for over a century, dating back to its acquisition in 1912. The Lagos State government must urgently resolve this issue by complying with the rule of law and respecting the judgment already delivered in favor of the Taylor Family. This includes the immediate compliance with the Consent Judgment of December 2019, recognising the Taylor Family’s ownership rights, payment of adequate compensation as mandated by law or the return of the property to its rightful owners, cessation of all acts of encroachment, harassment, or administrative delays that undermine the credibility of the judiciary and the government. This case serves as a litmus test for governance and justice in Lagos State. Failure to comply with a subsisting judgment erodes public trust in the legal system and sets a dangerous precedent where government institutions can act with impunity. The rule of law is the foundation of any democratic society, and it must be upheld at all costs. We hope that the Lagos State government will rise to the occasion, honor its obligations, and act in the interest of justice. Any further delay or resistance will not only amount to an abuse of power but will also continue to damage the credibility of public institutions. This is a matter of principle, justice, and accountability. The Lagos State Government must choose to be on the right side of history by respecting judicial decisions and ensuring fairness for all Nigerians.