User research is often praised as a pillar of good product development, but it’s not always clear how insights from research actually shape what gets built. Teams run interviews, surveys, usability tests, and ethnographic studies, but the gap between learning and doing can be surprisingly wide.
Turning research into product decisions requires more than just collecting data. It demands interpretation, prioritisation, and structured follow-through. Without this, research becomes a side activity useful in theory, but disconnected from the roadmap.
The first challenge is translating qualitative input into actionable insights. A quote from a user can be powerful, but unless it connects to a broader pattern or highlights a friction point with measurable impact, it risks becoming anecdotal. Grouping observations into themes, tagging pain points by frequency or severity, and mapping them to specific user journeys make the data more usable.
But insight alone isn’t enough. Research must compete with other decision factors, technical constraints, business goals, and stakeholder opinions.
What gives research weight in these conversations is clarity.
Instead of vague statements like “users are confused,” stronger framing might be: “80% of users failed to complete this flow in under two minutes during testing, resulting in drop-off.” That level of specificity changes how teams respond.
Timing also matters. Research that arrives after key decisions have already been made can feel like background noise. Integrating research into early stages of discovery ensures it shapes the framing of problems, not just the fine-tuning of solutions. It also allows product managers and engineers to be part of the learning process, not just consumers of a summary report.
Collaboration across functions plays a large role in making research actionable. When researchers and designers synthesise findings together, the jump from insight to interface becomes faster. When product and engineering are part of research sessions or playback meetings, alignment is smoother.
These cross-functional habits reduce the need to “convince” others of what users need, as everyone saw it firsthand.
There’s also value in small-scale, continuous research. Many teams think research has to be big, formal, or polished. But fast, scrappy methods, like showing a prototype to five users or running quick intercepts, can surface critical insights that nudge a product in the right direction. Over time, this builds a research culture where learning is embedded into product development, not bolted on.
To keep research visible, insights need to be documented well. A research repository or insight bank makes it easier to connect past findings to current work. But more importantly, tracking how those insights influenced specific decisions builds trust.
When teams can look back and see, “We added this feature because users asked for it, and it drove up retention,” it reinforces the value of research as a decision-making tool.
User research is not just about empathy. It’s about evidence. The most effective teams use it not only to understand users but to anchor trade-offs, defend prioritisation, and drive clarity. Research that lives in a slide deck has limited impact.
But research that directly shapes what gets shipped, that’s when it proves its worth.
Meet the author:
Dami Ojetunji is a product designer with five years of experience leading user-centred design, scalable design systems, and product strategy. She has shaped product direction at early and growth-stage startups, including Y Combinator-backed companies.
She is the founder of Tabs, a platform that curates African digital products to simplify market and design research for product teams. Her work bridges innovation and access by spotlighting high-quality solutions from the continent.
Beyond design, Dami is a mentor and advocate for design education. She supports aspiring designers, speaks at industry events, and fosters inclusive design communities. Her mission is to use intentional design to solve real-world problems and empower people in the digital economy.
Read also: Why African Fintech is Outpacing Silicon Valley (And What the West Can Learn)