A Coalition of Niger state support groups has thrown its weight behind the state government’s legal action against the Attorney-General of the Federation over exclusion of the state from the 13 per cent derivation
The President General of Community Association for Grassroots Transformation (CAGRAT), Mr Muhammadu Dagaci, made the disclosure in a statement made available to Blueprint on Monday.
Members of the coalition include CAGRAT, BIDA Forum, Agaie Emirate Consultative Forum, AZA development Association, Nupe development Forum, Edati People’s Foundation, Kutigi Youth Association and Coalition of Niger North Youth Forum.
Others are Borgu Youth Development Association, Kontagora Emirate Youth Development Association, Niger East Emirates Youth Council, Minna Emirate Youth Association and Coalition of Shiroro Youth Associations.
The coalition also includes Doko Development Association, Kusogi Majin Dodo Development Association and Vunchi Development Association’’.
The Niger state government had dragged the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice to the Supreme Court over the state’s omission in the 13 percent derivation.
The lead counsel to Niger state government, Mohammed Ndarani, SAN,
had in an originating summons sought the interpretation and application of section 232 (1) & (2) of the Nigerian constitution.
The subject matter of the suit is the failure of the federal government to include Niger state among the beneficiary states of the 13 percent derivation.
It is also about the omission of remitting same proceeds of fiscal revenue generated and accrued through Hydroelectric Power dams in Niger State, to the overall electricity generation to the national grid in Nigeria from 1968 till date.
Dagaci said the coalition wholeheartedly supports the state’s lawsuit that seeks to address a long-standing injustice, and ensure that Niger state receives its rightful share of revenue.
He said their justification for the support stems from the fact that Niger state has significantly contributed to national development through hydroelectric power generation, with no compensation from the federal government.
“The state’s exclusion from the derivation fund appears to contravene Section 162(2) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), which mandates that revenue be allocated based on derivation principles.
“Inclusion in the derivation fund would provide Niger State with much-needed resources to address infrastructure deficits, improve living standards, and promote economic growth’’.
He said they support the push for the apex court to interpret the constitution to determine whether Niger State qualifies as a resource producing state under Section 162(2).
“The apex court should grant all the reliefs sort by the Niger state counsel and declare that the state is entitled to the 13 percent derivation fund, as provided by the Allocation of Revenue Act, 2004.
“We stand in solidarity with the state government in this legal battle and we believe that justice and fairness demand that Niger State’s contributions be recognized and rewarded.
“We look forward to a favorable judgment that will benefit the people of this state, and promote equitable resource allocation in Nigeria,’’ he added.